Counting cards game

From counting cards to reconstructing game states

It’s not uncommon that there are doubts about whether a player drew an extra card or not. A good example of this is Guillaume Wafo-Tapa, alleged to have drawn an extra card during PT Journey into Nyx (which turned, after a thorough scrutiny of the video, to be false accusation).

This is not an easy situation to deal with. There are multiple elements to consider, very often the information is incomplete. However, by combining many different elements, it’s not impossible to manage to count cards or even better, to reconstruct the whole situation, which also helps evaluating whether a player played two lands in a turn or even assessing the right amount of life totals.

A small insight on Drawing Extra Cards

One of the reasons why Drawing Extra cards is worth a Game Loss is that one of the natural limitations of the game lies in drawing one card a turn. To draw more, you need to invest another somehow limited resource: mana.

It may happen that a player calls you because he feels his opponent has too many cards in hand. When this happens, your best move is to count the number of cards this player has had access to.

Pre-investigation: Toss and Mulligans

The very first two questions to ask are:

  1. Who played first?
  2. Did any player mulligan?
  3. If so, how many times?

On their respective turn one and barring mulligans, the Starting Player (SP) has access to 7 cards and the Drawing player (DP) to 8 cards.

Defining which turn we’re on.

Unless they cast card-drawing spells, each player draws exactly one card each turn.

This means that if you are counting during SP’s turn, both players should have the same number of cards, since DP did not yet draw for his turn.

If you count during DP’s turn, he should have one more card than SP.

This means that counting cards is also useful to determine which turn players are in:

  • For SP, the formula is: Turn number = number of cards – starting hand size + 1
  • For DP, the formula is: Turn number= number of cards – starting hand size

Easy, right? Let’s check the traps now!

Trap#1: Cards replacing themselves

Magic is full of cards that make you draw a card (cantrips) and/or search for a card in your library.
Take Ponder or Flooded Strand for instance: These cards replace themselves and legally let a player access to one more card.

If there are such cards that have been played or cast (as opposed to discarded/exiled), they should be dismissed when counting.

Variation 1: Drawing several cards at once

Divination makes the count slightly more complex, since they give the player access to more than one card. In such a case, exclude the number of drawn cards from the count: In this case, that would be Divination and another one

Variation 2: Drawing or searching a variable number of cards

Sphinx’s Revelation or Seek the horizon make the player access to a variable number of cards. Make sure players agree on how many cards were drawn/search. If they disagree, here are a few tips:

  • For Sphinx’s Revelation, checking how much life was gained on the notepad is very useful.
  • In the case of Seek the horizon, it seems unlikely the player didn’t take all of the three lands.

Variation 3: Cards reshuffling themselves

Green Sun’s Zenith is banned in Modern, hence it’s become rarer. However, it’s a good card to keep in mind: Always ask players if a card that reshuffled itself or part or all of the graveyard has been cast/activated earlier: Elixir of Immortality, Emrakul, etc.

Tips

  • Make sure you only exclude cards that do not replace themselves!
  • It’s easier to exclude the card that made the player draw/search cards along with another. It makes it easier if you need to quickly recount and or verify

Trap#2: Permanents that repeatedly make a player draw or search.

Cards like Jace, the Mind Sculptor, Land Tax or Courser of Kruphix can be really painful to take into account. They may make counting look like impossible, but that’s not (always) the case.

  • Have all players agree on how many times abilities from these permanents have been activated/have triggered.
    This should give you an idea of how many extra cards a player had access to.
  • If players are unsure, determine which turn they are in the game, what turn that card resolved and what it did exactly each turn.
    Jace, the Mind Sculptor’s first ability (+2 loyalty) does not give access to more cards but his second ability (0 loyalty) is +1 card for instance (draw 3, put 2 back).

It can obviously fail, especially if the game has already been long. However, let’s take this example from the World Magic Cup in Nice:

On turn 8, SP has the feeling DP has an extra card. A count of the cards indicates that DP may have an extra card. I say may because SP has Courser of Kruphix, which lets you play extra lands from the library. And here’s the crux of the issue: If the land was played from the library, it wouldn’t count towards the number of drawn cards, hence there would be no extra card in DP’s hand.
[Note: Extra here means “card that can’t be accounted for”]

That looked like almost impossible to assess. Actually, without any intervening element, it would have been impossible to assess.

By coincidence, SP was slightly mana screwed and only had 4 lands on the battlefield and one in the graveyard. That limited amount of resources is something that I could take advantage of. So we reconstructed the game from SP’s side

  • Temple of Abandon
  • Forest
  • Nykthos / Courser of Kruphix
  • Another Nykthos/Polukranos
  • Courser of Kruphix
  • Forest/Arbor Colossus/Sylvan Caryatid

Both players agreed on that sequence, most notably that Nykthos#2 was played on turn 4 and the Caryatid wasn’t cast on turn 2. Based on this precise sequence, I could draw the following conclusions:

  • Since SP had to play another Nykthos on turn 4, despite it’s legendary, it was pretty clear that he did NOT have the Forest in his hand at that moment.
    Obviously, he could have misplayed but that doesn’t look realistic.
  • Since, when you have Courser of Kruphix on the battlefield, the only way to draw a land is to have two in a row on the top of the library, it meant that the Forest was played from the top of the library.

And there came the logical conclusion: DP had an extra card he was unable to account for. He therefore got a Game Loss for DEC.

Teachings:

  • The more resources are limited, the more you can actually reconstruct a game.
  • Make sure both players agree on the game state before presenting your conclusions. This avoids one of them metagames tour reasoning by conveniently “not being sure”

Drawing extra cards VS Failure to draw

The IPG states that “Additionally, it is Drawing Extra Cards if a player has excess cards in their hand that he or she cannot account for.”

Before choosing that path, you need to make sure that this player really has an extra card and that it cannot be the opponent having one too few. This is why determining the number of turns and checking the card count against the turn count is important.

You might also like
Kavil Arranges Flash Game Cards Counting 1 to 10 Playing
Kavil Arranges Flash Game Cards Counting 1 to 10 Playing ...
Counting Cards-Performance
Counting Cards-Performance
Preschool All-In-One Learning - Bubble School Adventure Basic Skills A to Z: Learn to Read and Count with Animals and 220 Interactive Flash Cards - Educational Toy for Baby, Toddler & Kindergarten Explorers by Abby Monkey® Games for Kids
Mobile Application (22learn, LLC)
  • 10 Educational Learning Categories
  • 220 Interactive First Words Flash Cards Curriculum developed and reviewed by preschool education expert
  • Appealing, child-friendly interface with adorable animated animal characters
  • Possibility to choose uppercase / lowercase / or capitalized words
  • All pronunciation done by professional voice-over actors
Counting Cards! Scrolls Ranked Match E12 Late Game Growth
Counting Cards! Scrolls Ranked Match E12 Late Game Growth ...
How to Count Cards : Free Card Counting Game
How to Count Cards : Free Card Counting Game
Related Posts